<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thelongmile &#124; 2011 &#187; privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelongmile.net/tag/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelongmile.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>ISP&#8217;s and P2P&#8230; It&#8217;s going downhill</title>
		<link>http://www.thelongmile.net/2009/07/isps-and-p2p-its-going-downhill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelongmile.net/2009/07/isps-and-p2p-its-going-downhill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelongmile</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filesharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongmile.net/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been aware for some time now of the government and indeed the ISP&#8217;s increasing awareness of that newfangled technology known as P2P (Peer 2 Peer file sharing). Over the past few months the publicity on this subject has grown rather dramatically as ArsTechnica recently broke the news of one particular ISP in the UK [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.iconfinder.net/data/icons/CrystalClear/128x128/filesystems/connect_to_network.png" alt="network" align="left" />We&#8217;ve been aware for some time now of the government and indeed the ISP&#8217;s increasing awareness of that newfangled technology known as P2P (Peer 2 Peer file sharing).</p>
<p>Over the past few months the publicity on this subject has grown rather dramatically as <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/07/one-strike-uk-isp-goes-medieval-on-p2p-users-relents.ars">ArsTechnica recently broke the news of one particular ISP in the UK </a> that went &#8220;medieval&#8221; that vowed to disconnect users after a single suspected copyright breach.</p>
<p>However herein lies a few questions.<br />
How does the ISP actually know what we are doing?<br />
and more importantly<br />
If they do know how what we are doing, how do they know what we are doing is illegal? </p>
<p>Now of course, we all know that ISP&#8217;s monitor content that is downloaded through their network. They have to. Usually it&#8217;s not in depth, it&#8217;s more &#8220;packet inspection&#8221; to ensure that data is coming in and out successfully and without error, however it is possible to monitor exactly what comes in and out. And be exactly, I really do mean exactly. If i send an email out, it is entirely possible for the ISP to pick that up, and read it word for word. Now obviously there are some limitations but I won&#8217;t go into that here.</p>
<p>The biggest problem is, that ISP&#8217;s like the one mentioned in ArsTechnica, will be looking for P2P connections. And here is the problem, and relating to my second question. </p>
<p>P2P is NOT illegal, Fact. P2P is a technology, not an activity. In fact would it surprise you to know that Microsoft uses P2P? That even I use P2P?<br />
When Microsoft released the Windows 7 Beta and Release Candidates they offered it for download, of course. But the downloads were all through a P2P service. it was the most efficient way of distributing the application whilst producing minimal load on their servers. I.e. parts of the file were downloaded from hundreds of thousands of other users who were downloading it rather than directly from Microsoft. </p>
<p>Now that is a completely legitimate use of P2P technology. Another prime example is <a href="http://www.vuze.com">Vuze</a>. <a href="http://www.vuze.com">Vuze</a> is a &#8220;content delivery network&#8221;. Essentially it has it&#8217;s own platform and website where it distributes things like free content, or media released under the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/">Creative Commons Licence</a> or even movie trailers. All completely legitimately. And the files that are downloaded from <a href="http://www.vuze.com">Vuze</a> are downloaded through the P2P technology. But there is an even bigger problem. Seeding. </p>
<p>When you download a file through <a href="http://www.vuze.com">Vuze</a> be it legitimately or not, the file sits on your computer and is then uploaded or &#8220;seeded&#8221; to other downloads, which is how P2P technology works. The problem with this, is of course the fact that ISP&#8217;s monitoring these file uploads and downloads might mistake it for illegitimate P2P use. Unless a human is sat looking at every single file, and knows exactly what it is, the ISP&#8217;s could potentially block millions of users.</p>
<p>There is of course another method which is site blocking. Bad idea again and here&#8217;s why. File sharing sites such as <a href="http://www.rapidshare.com">RapidShare</a> or <a href="http://www.megaupload.com/">MegaUpload </a>are all well known for their illegal use. However legitimate users would then be blocked. I don&#8217;t mind saying that I actually pay for a RapidShare account. Why? Because a lot of the software I download, that is legal and free I might add, is hosted on <a href="http://www.rapidshare.com">RapidShare</a>. I also host my own files such as tools and utilities that I use on a regular basis (such as a bootdisk for Windows) so that I can download them quickly and easily without paying nearly five times the price for a hosting plan somewhere JUST to hold files for downloads. </p>
<p>So if ISP&#8217;s start blocking these sites then we start to affect the legitimate users and of course destroy all the trust anyone has in ISP&#8217;s. Even torrent sites contain legal content. There are quite a few websites out there that also distribute their software through torrents, including several linux distributors. Again all legally. </p>
<p>The fact of the matter is that the internet is really just too large to police in this manner. In fact the ISP mentioned in the <a href="http://www.arstechnica.com">ArsTechnica</a> article even changed it&#8217;s approach to a &#8216;softer&#8217; one for potential copyright breaches. But unfortunately with the way things are going, this is going to get ugly, and fast, and there are going to be a lot of people out there that really weren&#8217;t breaking the law finding themselves at the wrong end of a court order.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thelongmile.net%2F2009%2F07%2Fisps-and-p2p-its-going-downhill%2F&amp;title=ISP%26%238217%3Bs%20and%20P2P%26%238230%3B%20It%26%238217%3Bs%20going%20downhill" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.thelongmile.net/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelongmile.net/2009/07/isps-and-p2p-its-going-downhill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bug Report</title>
		<link>http://www.thelongmile.net/2009/04/bug-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelongmile.net/2009/04/bug-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelongmile</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweetbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelongmile.net/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-293" title="Bugs" src="http://thelongmile.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/1238684353_bug.png" alt="Bugs" width="128" height="128" /> After the first 12 hours of the site being live, I wanted to share with you the bugs I have found, hopefully they will be fixed soon, but thankfully it's all going rather well! Click the Read More Button for more information]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-295" title="Injection" src="http://thelongmile.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/1238684487_virussafe.png" alt="Injection" width="128" height="128" />So far so good. In the first 12 hours of the site being up, we&#8217;ve had very few problems, but at the moment, we are not completley in the clear. Here are a few of the details about some of the issues we are currently having</p>
<ol>
<li>The Backup system that I had implemented has failed completely, it&#8217;s now duplicating backups, and not finishing others</li>
<li>Tweetbacks are completely broken. Despite 30 or so tweetbacks that should be present, the system simply isn&#8217;t working at all, I&#8217;ve tried to contact the developer of the plugin for wordpress, but have had no luck. You can still use the link, but at the moment, they are not picking up tweetbacks, though it seems I am not the only one with this issue</li>
<li>Site Performance has dropped significantly since the first 400 hits, owing largley to the backup system going on when it isn&#8217;t suppost to. I&#8217;ve disabled the backup system for now, and hopefully this will fix it. I am still getting an overwhelmingly good 6 second load time at the moment, so it isn&#8217;t a huge priority</li>
<li>Statistics are not matching up between the two systems I am using, Statpress Reloaded and Wassup are reporting completley different values to each other, and different to my web hosts core stats system. I am looking at changing or updating these when I find out which is more accurate, I have however implemented google anylitics as this is a global system, that is far more reliable.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>A note on security and privacy</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-296" title="Safe" src="http://thelongmile.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/1238684890_kfm.png" alt="Safe" width="128" height="128" />A few users have contacted me about the saftey and security of their data, especially over concerns about giving their email address in the comments form which is required at this time. So I wanted to clear up a few details</p>
<ul>
<li>The comments system must have an email address to allow comments, this prevents hundereds of spam comments per day. If you don&#8217;t want to put your email address, put admin@thelongmile.net in as the email</li>
<li>Any data you submit is stored securley and is only visible to me. It will NEVER be sold nor will it ever be passed on. I have a plugin here which removes all email addresses from the databases other than my own email and the site admins, and it is set to be run once every two months</li>
<li>The sites security is paramount, and has been built up in the testing area with several security changes to the original wordpress system. I also have plugins here which routinely check the files themselves for integrity and to ensure they have the correct permissions</li>
<li>The hosting provider of this site, buyHTTP (current provider at the time of writing this) has it&#8217;s own security system in place, which has proven to be extremely secure. This site has undergone thorough testing to ensure it is safe, and that your data is safe</li>
</ul>
<p>If you find a bug, please leave it in the comments below, or click on the contact button to send me more information.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelongmile.net/2009/04/bug-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

